Recommended by Diamantino Almeida
The question The Citizens keeps asking is the one most technology coverage avoids entirely. Not what the technology can do. But who it is being built for, who authorised it, and who is paying the price when it goes wrong. If you read this newsletter because you believe the people building these systems should be answerable to the people living inside them, The Citizens is the publication doing that work most directly in the UK right now.
Explores regenerative tech as a paradigm shift, backing founders building antifragile systems for abundance. Their posts detail investment theses on reversing planetary damage.
Mila writes about the moment money and technology start making your decisions for you. It also has a broader, reflective voice around systems, trust, and financial infrastructure, with writing that feels analytical and warning-oriented.
This is a great publication if you are into SaaS.
If you are in tech you must follow this newsletter from Kent Beck. Truly essential. A highly respected software thinker, which gives it strong authority for readers interested in engineering practice
![[ Center for Humane Technology ]](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!uhgK!,w_144,h_144,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5f9f5ef8-865a-4eb3-b23e-c8dfdc8401d2_518x518.png)
The question they keep asking is the one the industry keeps avoiding. Not "what can this technology do" but "what is it doing to us, and who decided that was acceptable." That question is why this publication exists. It is also why mine does.
